Decision in MMA: How Judges Score Fights and What It Means for Fans

If you’ve ever watched an MMA bout end with a judge’s scorecard, you know the moment can feel confusing. Why did Fighter A win on points when the fight looked close? The answer lies in the way judges break down each round and the criteria they use. In this guide we’ll walk through the basics of MMA decisions, explain the scoring system, and give you practical tips to read the cards like a pro.

How Judges Score Each Round

Every round is judged on three factors: effective striking, grappling, and aggression. Effective striking means clean hits that actually affect the opponent. Effective grappling looks at successful takedowns, submissions, and control on the ground. Aggression is a tie‑breaker – it rewards the fighter who constantly pushes forward.

Judges give a round a 10‑9 score most of the time. If one fighter dominates, they might earn a 10‑8. A 10‑7 is rare and only used for overwhelming control. At the end of the fight the judges add up the points from each round to determine the final decision: unanimous, split, or majority.

Types of Decisions and What They Tell You

A unanimous decision means all three judges saw the same winner. This often happens when one fighter clearly out‑performed the other. A split decision occurs when two judges pick one fighter and the third picks the other. That usually signals a very close bout.

A majority decision is when two judges favor one fighter and the third calls it a draw. A draw itself can be unanimous, majority, or split, depending on how the judges score.

Understanding these terms helps you know whether a fight was a clear win or a borderline contest. It also explains why fans sometimes argue about a decision – the scoring criteria leave room for interpretation.

When you watch a fight, try to note who lands the more significant strikes, who secures takedowns, and who controls the cage. Compare those observations to the judges’ scores. If they match, the decision likely reflects the action. If they differ, you’ve spotted a potential controversy.

Finally, remember that judges are human and can make mistakes. The UFC and other promotions occasionally review controversial decisions, but the official result usually stands unless there’s a clear error.

Now you have the tools to decode any MMA decision. Next time a fight goes the distance, you’ll know exactly why the judges gave the verdict they did, and you can join the conversation with confidence.

Is it stupid to decide a championship with one game? 1 May 2023
  • Kaius Farrell
  • 0 Comments

Is it stupid to decide a championship with one game?

In my latest blog post, I tackled the controversial topic of deciding a championship with just one game. I explored the pros and cons of this approach, touching on how it can create excitement and unpredictability but may also lead to unfair outcomes or an inaccurate representation of a team's skill. I discussed how other sports and leagues handle championships, and considered whether a playoff system or a series of games might be a better solution. Overall, I concluded that while a single-game championship may not always be the ideal choice, it can still provide an entertaining and dynamic experience for fans. However, it's essential to weigh the potential risks and benefits before implementing such a system in any sport.

View More